This is an interesting little reel for two gentlemen and four ladies which I would consider reasonable for anywhere from the late 1820s to, at least in Scotland, the 1870s or even later. I'm hesitant to date it too specifically since neither of the sources I have are precisely dated, and while one is at best late 1820s and the other well into the mid-nineteenth century, this reel is perfectly compatible with Regency style. Unless I were in a particularly strict-constructionist mood, I wouldn't blink an eye to see it performed at a Regency event.
I have only two sources for this Reel of Six: Lowe's Ball-Conductor and Assembly Guide, third edition (Edinburgh, c1830) and The Excelsior Manual of Dancing, by J. F. Wallace (Glasgow, c1875). The dating on The Excelsior Manual is especially fuzzy. The dances could be from as early as c1860, but the illustrations of the ladies dresses suggest the early 1870s to me. In Traditional Dancing in Scotland, J. P. and T. M. Flett list it as c1872. A later edition of The Excelsior Manual (datable from its contents to no earlier than the mid-1890s and listed by the Fletts as c1900) does not include this Reel of Six. Nor have I found it in any other Scottish dance manuals of the nineteenth century, though my collection of those is thin enough that I wouldn't take that as a definitive statement about it having never appeared elsewhere.
Unlike most reels for six dancers, this reel is in "diamond" formation, like a Reel of Five. The four ladies are at the four points of an imaginary diamond with the two gentlemen back to back in the center, and the reels are reels for four dancers rather than for three.
In complexity, this Reel of Six falls somewhere between the simpler Reels of Five and the very elaborate one created by Regency London dancing master Thomas Wilson, which I described here. There is no added circling or passing under arms, but it does include the fast cross by the outside dancers between the heying (reeling) dancers. This is actually easier to pace with six dancers rather than five. Other than that little detail, it consists of a standard alternation of heying (reeling) and setting, tweaked to accommodate the two extra ladies. But unlike Wilson's choreographed reels, the sources for this one are impeccably Scottish.
(Note that the English used "hey" and the Scots used, and use, "reel" for the weaving-figure-eight figure. Since the sources for this reel are Scottish, I am going to just use "reel" from here on.)
The Lowes did not give any specific timing in their description:
The Gentlemen, with two of the Ladies, form a reel of four, during which, and when the two Ladies are close together in the middle, the other two Ladies cross over, and re-cross, when the first two Ladies are in the middle again; all set, the Gentlemen turning to the Ladies alternately; they then reel with the other Ladies.
Wallace used very similar language but was more specific in giving the standard eight bars to the reel and eight bars to the setting. Here's the breakdown; performance notes follow:
"Diamond" Reel of Six
Starting position: four ladies in "diamond" formation at the four compass points. Two gentlemen back to back in the center facing two ladies along one axis of the "diamond".
Neither source discusses specific steps for Scotch reels, so I default as usual to the steps given by Scottish dancing master Francis Peacock in his Sketches relative to the history and theory, but more especially to the practice of dancing (Aberdeen, 1805) and the common workhorse setting step, the pas de basque. Everyone begins with the right foot.
Music
There is no standard music; any suitable period reel will do. The dance done four times through to get the gentlemen back to starting position requires sixty-four bars of music, or thirty-two bars played twice. In the absence of live musicians, those willing to do the dance eight times through can find two very good reels of thirty-two bars played four times on the Spare Parts album The Regency Ballroom. Both "Lady Mary Ramsay" and "Bonnie Highland Laddie" will work perfectly for this.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.