Having started out with the complex "New Reel of Five" created by Regency London dancing master Thomas Wilson, it seems that it would be useful to go back and discuss the "common" reel of five which Wilson included in his books along with his own inventions "to render the work more complete." It's hard to say how "common" this reel actually was, as I have no sources for it other than Wilson. It's possible that it was simply so common that no one else saw any need to write it down. I certainly see no reason for Wilson to have presented it falsely; he was not the least bit shy about taking credit for his own choreography.
The diagram given by Wilson in his The Complete System of English Country Dancing (London, c1815) is above at left. The original text, from the same source:
The Lady in the middle at B, heys with the Ladies at A C, then sets to them, then heys with the two Gentlemen at F D, and takes the place of the Gentleman at F, who will then occupy the centre: he then finishes the Reel by setting to the persons at F D, then hey with the Ladies at C A, and leaves one of them in the centre, so that they all progressively occupy every situation in the figure.
That's reasonably straightforward, though his blithe assurance that "they all progressively occupy every situation in the figure", if taken to the extreme of dancing until everyone is back in their precise original places, will require an awful lot of repeats. Wilson gives his reel specifically for either three gentlemen and two ladies or vice-versa, but the gender of the five dancers has no effect on the dance. Any combination, or five of one gender, will work fine.
Wilson's description of the common reel of five is also found in the first (1808), third (1811), and fourth (1822) editions of his An Analysis of Country Dancing. I don't have a copy of the second edition to check, but one may safely assume it appeared there as well. In the first edition, it appeared with a different diagram the title "Another Reel of Five" instead of just "Reel of Five", and a slightly less specific description of the progression:
The Lady in the middle at B, heys with the ladies at A C, then sets to them, she then sets to the Gentlemen at F D; then heys with the Gentlemen at F D, which brings one of them into the centre, so that they all progressively occupy every situation in the figure.
The note about it being the common reel of five is the same. Wilson may have expanded his description to reduce confusion. See the notes below for the alternate diagram and my thoughts on it.
In the following reconstruction, I've used the letters to refer to the dancers rather than the locations.
Wilson's instructions are actually quite good, and if one takes his order of listing the dancers as meaning the order in which one should hey and set with them, the reconstruction from his later manuals is fairly straightforward. The only detail he leaves out is which shoulder to start the hey with. Since the center dancer is turning to the left to begin the hey, it makes sense to have the dancers pass by the left shoulder, so the center dancer only has to turn about forty-five degrees. That lets him gracefully finish setting with the lady he or she is facing, rather than having to use the last setting step to turn 135 degrees to get into position for a right-shoulder hey.
Since Wilson does not specify steps for Scotch reels, I recommend the steps given by Scottish dancing master Francis Peacock in Sketches relative to the history and theory, but more especially to the practice of dancing (Aberdeen, 1805) and the pas de basque, a documentable period setting step. Everyone begins on the right foot. For the heys, use the Kemshóole step, one per measure.
For the setting, the dancers can use a simple pas de basque or, for the ambitious, any of Peacock's setting steps or combinations. Reels are an opportunity for improvisation by the dancers, though I prefer to use simpler steps in the more complex choreographies and the pas de basque makes it easy for the center dancer to turn while setting. Other possibilities include eight Minor Kemkóssy each way, though it's hard to make so many of them feel like anything other than jogging in place. Two pairs of Single Kemkóssy, Seby-trast, or Lematrást steps (all one bar each or two bars for a pair) would also work, or any of the myriad possible combinations of these steps.
Music
Wilson gives the timing of eight bars each for heying and setting. The length of the figure makes using a recording challenging; unless one happens to have a track of precisely the right length, any recording would have to be edited to fit precisely if the dancers want to end at a specific point. Obviously live musicians are ideal, but in their absence, tracks for possible trimming would include Spare Parts' reels on The Regency Ballroom (128b, could be cut down for the shortest 96b version) and Green Ginger's very lengthy (384b) recordings, which could be chopped down for the longest version. There are many, many other recordings of reels around, so provided one avoids the many with not-period-for-the-Regency-ballroom accordions, there are plenty of others to choose from.
Or, the dancers could just end wherever the music does and not worry too much about it. You can see that in the video if you watch until the end. They did have live musicians, but it looks to me like the master of ceremonies told them that was plenty and they could stop. I wasn't dancing, myself, but I think as a dancer, I'd have agreed.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.